Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:34

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sophie Cunningham’s $1M Social Jump Dwarfs WNBA Fines - Sportico.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What actor is genetically gifted?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Where Seattle Mariners stand in All-Star voting - Seattle Sports
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
U.S. Employers Are Shedding Jobs as DOGE Cuts Deep - Barron's
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Is modular building a fix for NY's housing crisis? State officials hope so. - Gothamist
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.